Whatsapp
Twitter
Linkedin
Mail
Copy link Polysulphate Soybean Trial in Argentina
61
Mercedes, Corrientes, Argentina 2017
61
Key Conclusions
This trial comparing the efficiency of different sources of sulfur found that soybean grown with Polysulphate fertilizer in Northeast Argentina showed an impressive increase in yield of up to 61%.
Objective
To compare, under soybean (Glycine max) grown in field conditions, the agronomic and economic efficiency of fertilizer bulk blends that include Polysulphate with other current formulations.
Trial Details
Trial station
Mercedes, Corrientes, Argentina
Crop
Soybean
Product
Polysulphate®
Assessments
Soybean grain yield
Treatments
The treatments were allocated in a randomized complete block design with 4 replications.
All the treatments were based on different sources of S that were applied at sowing and with a single rate of P (30 kg/ha P2O5), in addition to other fertilizer combinations, including a control with no sulfur. Gypsum and single super phosphate (SSP) treatments were included since they were the common sources of S with comparable rates of S to Polysulphate.
| Treatment - blends (w/w) | Fertilizer rate | N | P2O5 | K2O | MgO | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| kg/ha | kg/ha | kg/ha | kg/ha | kg/ha | kg/ha | |
| Control | 58 | 6 | 30 | - | - | - |
| SSP | 158 | 0 | 30 | - | - | 19 |
| MAP + Gypsum (S=19) | 167 | 6 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 19 |
| MAP + Polysulphate (S=19) | 158 | 6 | 30 | 14 | 6 | 19 |
| MAP + Polysulphate (S=38) | 258 | 6 | 30 | 28 | 12 | 38 |
| MAP + Polysulphate (S=57) | 358 | 6 | 30 | 42 | 18 | 57 |
Treatments
The treatments were allocated in a randomized complete block design with 4 replications.
All the treatments were based on different sources of S that were applied at sowing and with a single rate of P (30 kg/ha P2O5), in addition to other fertilizer combinations, including a control with no sulfur. Gypsum and single super phosphate (SSP) treatments were included since they were the common sources of S with comparable rates of S to Polysulphate.
| Treatment - blends (w/w) | Fertilizer rate | N | P2O5 | K2O | MgO | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| kg/ha | kg/ha | kg/ha | kg/ha | kg/ha | kg/ha | |
| Control | 58 | 6 | 30 | - | - | - |
| SSP | 158 | 0 | 30 | - | - | 19 |
| MAP + Gypsum (S=19) | 167 | 6 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 19 |
| MAP + Polysulphate (S=19) | 158 | 6 | 30 | 14 | 6 | 19 |
| MAP + Polysulphate (S=38) | 258 | 6 | 30 | 28 | 12 | 38 |
| MAP + Polysulphate (S=57) | 358 | 6 | 30 | 42 | 18 | 57 |
Results
- Soybean responded significantly to sulfur application.
- There were statistical differences between the Polysulphate and other sources of sulfur. Additionally, it was the soybean responded to increasing rates of Polysulphate as a result of the increasing nutrient addition.
Polysulphate fertilizer increases soybean grain yield.
Different letters above bars indicate significant differences among treatments (p<0.05)
From research funded by the International Potash Institute www.ipipotash.org.
Other Interesting Trials
Soybean & Polysulphate
Lucas do Rio Verde, Mato Grosso state, Brazil, 2017
9.7
Soybean & Polysulphate
Cruz Alta, Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil, 2019
3.9
Soybean & Polysulphate
Itapúa, Paraguay, 2018
10.8
