Turf response longevity trial

Trial designed to compare longevity of turf response for Sierrablen Plus Active 19-5-18 compared with 3 competitor products.

UK
2022

Key Conclusions

The trial, aimed at comparing the longevity of turf response to Sierrablen Plus 19-5-18 versus three competitor products, concluded that Sierrablen Plus not only demonstrated excellent granulation but also maintained acceptable turf color and quality for over three months, outperforming the competitors in sustaining turf health and appearance.

Objective

The trial investigates the efficacy of Sierrablen Plus in sports pitch nutrition, comparing it against competitors to determine its longevity of turf response.

Trial Details

Trial station

UK

Product

Sierrablen Plus

Assessments

Turf colour and quality

Treatments

A randomised and replicated field trial located on a Lolium perenne sward over a professional sand dominated fibresand rootzone.

 

Treatment NoProductNPK analysisApplication rate Stated longevity
T1Sierrablen Plus Active19-5-1830 g/m23 months +
T2Competitor 120-5-830 g/m23 - 4 months
T3Competitor 216-0-1230 g/m23 months
T4Competitor 311-4-22 + Fe30 g/m23 - 4 months

 

Turf Colour was measured on a 1-10 scale regularly through the trial up to 90 days.

 

Turf Quality was measured on a 1-10 scale regularly through the trial up to 90 day.

 

Treatments

A randomised and replicated field trial located on a Lolium perenne sward over a professional sand dominated fibresand rootzone.

 

Treatment NoProductNPK analysisApplication rate Stated longevity
T1Sierrablen Plus Active19-5-1830 g/m23 months +
T2Competitor 120-5-830 g/m23 - 4 months
T3Competitor 216-0-1230 g/m23 months
T4Competitor 311-4-22 + Fe30 g/m23 - 4 months

 

Turf Colour was measured on a 1-10 scale regularly through the trial up to 90 days.

 

Turf Quality was measured on a 1-10 scale regularly through the trial up to 90 day.

 

Results

Turf colour

  • Turf colour remained above 5.0 (acceptable) for 85 days after application.
  • All other products dropped below a score of 5.0.
  • Two products did not provide good colour for 60 days (despite having stated longevities of 3M).

 

Turf quality

  • Turf quality remained above 5.0 (acceptable) for 85 days after application.
  • All other products dropped below a score of 5.0.
  • Two products did not provide good turf quality for 60 days (despite having stated longevities of 3M).

More related trials

Benefits of recycled phosphorus
Bangor University, Wales
Trail

50

Increased root mass
Winter sports pitch recovery
Northern England, 2023
ITM can reduce Dollar spot
Lyon Salvagny Golf Club, France, 2020