Whatsapp
Mail
Copy link Low Carbon Footprint Agriculture is a sustainable approach to food production that aims to minimise the environmental impact of farming.
As a leading fertiliser manufacturer committed to sustainability, ICL leads the way in providing growers with the solutions needed to adopt sustainable farming practices that reduce agriculture’s carbon footprint.
Green House Gas Emissions and Fertilisers
The carbon footprint related to fertiliser production and use is typically divided into 3 different types, which can be described as:
- Scope 1: emissions from the production of the fertilisers
- Scope 2: emissions from generating the energy used in fertiliser production
- Scope 3: emissions from the use of fertilisers.
Analysis and Measurement
ICL has engaged an independent certified company, Filkin & Co EHS Limited, to calculate the carbon footprint of our entire plant nutrition portfolio following the GHG Protocol and ISO 14064 standards for Carbon Footprints. Taking the calculation of Polysulphate fertiliser’s carbon footprint as an example, measurements of all the processes from ICL’s polyhalite mine, where Polysulphate originates, through to its storage were analysed. While these calculations are clearly complicated, the result is a simple number representing the carbon footprint as the kg of carbon dioxide equivalent produced per kg of product.
Leading the Way
In a first for the industry, ICL will start adding this carbon footprint information to product labels using a simple graphical scale, creating a straightforward way to compare different products’ carbon footprints. For growers looking to lower their carbon footprint, this should provide an excellent starting point, making it easier than ever to make more sustainable farming decisions that reduce the carbon footprint of farming.
Choosing Fertilisers to Lower Carbon Footprint
At its simplest, agriculture’s carbon footprint can be improved by choosing a fertiliser with a lower carbon footprint than alternative products. Some fertilisers require energy-intensive manufacturing processes that can result in a higher carbon footprint than an alternative, low-carbon footprint product. For example, ICL’s natural multi-nutrient Polysulphate fertiliser is just mined, crushed, and screened ready for use, and, therefore, it has the lowest carbon footprint when compared with alternatives.
Timing of Nutrient Release
Everyone involved in farming knows that agriculture is complicated. The initial product choice is just one aspect of farming’s carbon footprint.
Crops continually take up nutrients, a little at a time, throughout their growth cycle, with the demand for nutrients changing at each growth stage. And yet, fertilisers are generally applied to crops at select times during the growing season. As a result, a proportion of the nutrients fertilisers deliver can escape the plants’ roots through leaching or runoff. With every nutrient in a fertiliser having a carbon footprint, any improvement in the ratio of nutrients taken up compared to those lost to the environment will improve agriculture’s overall carbon footprint.
Choosing prolonged-release or controlled-release fertilisers that better match the nutrient release to the crop’s needs reduces nutrient losses to the environment and increases sustainability. Compared to urea, for example, controlled-release fertilisers reduce nitrous oxide (NOx) emission from growing crops, which, considering 1 kg of nitrous oxide (N2O) has an equivalent environmental impact to 298 kg of CO2, is a significant step in reducing farming’s contribution to global warming. Research by the NMI Institute in the Netherlands has demonstrated how using controlled-release fertilisers reduces ammonia (NH4) losses to the atmosphere and the NO3 losses through leaching into the groundwater, benefitting human and animal health and the broader ecosystem.
With a nutrient release duration of between 1 and 6 months, a single application of one of ICL’s Agrocote controlled-release fertilisers can provide the nutrients required for an entire growing season. Therefore, choosing to use controlled-release fertilisers removes the financial and environmental costs of additional fertiliser applications and can also reduce nitrogen emissions that contribute to global warming.
Increasing Fertiliser Efficiency
Another significant component in the growers’ toolkit for improving the carbon footprint of crop production revolves around the crops’ Nutrient Use Efficiency (NUE). NUE is the ability of crops to take up, assimilate, and utilise nutrients to maximize yields. When referred to as Agronomic Efficiency, it is the increase in yield per unit of nutrient applied, or in other words, getting the best return for every gram of fertiliser applied.
Nutrient Use Efficiency can be improved through the choice of fertilisers. As mentioned above, choosing a fertiliser with a release rate that matches the crops’ nutrient requirements prevents nutrients from being leached out of the reach of the plant roots. But NUE can also refer to plants’ ability to efficiently utilise the nutrients taken up. One key to this is balanced nutrition, ensuring plants get the right nutrient combination.
Balanced Nutrition is often illustrated by the principle of Leibig’s law, which states that growth is not limited by the total resources available but by the scarcest resource. Balanced fertilisation prevents an imbalance that might mean plants can not efficiently utilise the available nutrients.
Nutrient Availability
It is important that nutrients are not only available but are available in the correct form. In some situations, nutrients may be present in the soil but can be locked away due to the soil conditions or other environmental factors. Acidic soils may restrict phosphorus availability, while alkaline soils may limit micronutrient availability. In these situations, care must be taken to ensure the nutrients crops require are still available.
Foliar fertiliser application delivers precise, targeted plant nutrition directly to the crops’ leaves. ICL’s liquid and water-soluble foliar fertiliser portfolio includes nutrient combinations crafted for all crops and growth stages, with multiple macronutrient (NPK) and trace element mixes. Foliar fertilisers are ideal for stimulating crop growth, relieving plant stress, and boosting productivity while at the same time minimising nutrient losses to the environment.
ICL has also developed water soluble fertilisers (WSF) for fertigation systems, another tool to improving nutrient availability and reduce losses. Fertigation increases nutrient use efficiency. Irrigation systems deliver nutrients directly to plant roots to ensure crops benefit from targeted, precise nutrient doses that meet crops’ needs while minimising nutrient losses through leaching or runoff, reducing fertiliser waste, and maximising uptake.
Livestock and Dairy Production
There are also areas of livestock production where changes to fertiliser choice and use can reduce on-farm carbon footprint. Research shows how improving silage quality can reduce methane production by approximately 10% for dairy cattle and around 17% for beef production. Both these significant improvements can be achieved by improving the fertiliser strategy for grass silage production.
Lowering Carbon Footprint
Reducing agriculture’s carbon footprint is an important goal. ICL is committed to improving sustainability, and our R&D teams are engaged in producing next-generation fertilisers designed to equip growers with the tools to reduce their carbon footprint. With the industry-first labels that identify fertilisers’ carbon footprint credentials, it is easier than ever before to see and compare different fertilisers. Growers now have a straightforward way to make decisions that will positively impact agriculture’s carbon footprint.
