Polysulphate Soybean Trial in Argentina

61

Yield Increase
Soybean grown with Polysulphate fertilizer in Northeast Argentina showed an impressive increase in yield of up to 61%

Mercedes, Corrientes, Argentina
2017

Trail

61

Yield Increase

Key Conclusions

This trial comparing the efficiency of different sources of sulfur found that soybean grown with Polysulphate fertilizer in Northeast Argentina showed an impressive increase in yield of up to 61%.

Objective

To compare, under soybean (Glycine max) grown in field conditions, the agronomic and economic efficiency of fertilizer bulk blends that include Polysulphate with other current formulations.

Trial Details

Trial station

Mercedes, Corrientes, Argentina

Crop

Soybean

Product

Polysulphate®

Assessments

Soybean grain yield

Treatments

The treatments were allocated in a randomized complete block design with four replications. 

All the treatments were based on different sources of S that were applied at sowing and with a single rate of P (30 kg/ha or 27 lbs/acre P2O5). In addition to the sulfur containing treatments, a control with no sulfur was included (MAP was used to provide the necessary phosphorus). Gypsum and single super phosphate (SSP) treatments were included since they were the common sources of S with comparable rates of S to Polysulphate (19 kg/ha or 17 lbs/acre). 

 

Treatment - blends (w/w)Fertilizer rateNP2O5K2OMgS
kg/ha (lbs/acre) kg/ha (lbs/acre) kg/ha (lbs/acre) kg/ha (lbs/acre) kg/ha (lbs/acre) kg/ha (lbs/acre)
Control (MAP only) 58 (52)6 (5)30 (27)---
SSP158 (141)030 (27)--19 (17)
MAP + Gypsum (S=19)167 (149)6 (5)30 (27)0019 (17)
MAP + Polysulphate (S=19)158 (141)6 (5)30 (27)14 (21)4 (3)19 (17)
MAP + Polysulphate (S=38)258 (230)6 (5)30 (27)28 (25)7 (6)38 (34)
MAP + Polysulphate (S=57)358 (319)6 (5)30 (27)42 (37)11 (10)57 (51)

Treatments

The treatments were allocated in a randomized complete block design with four replications. 

All the treatments were based on different sources of S that were applied at sowing and with a single rate of P (30 kg/ha or 27 lbs/acre P2O5). In addition to the sulfur containing treatments, a control with no sulfur was included (MAP was used to provide the necessary phosphorus). Gypsum and single super phosphate (SSP) treatments were included since they were the common sources of S with comparable rates of S to Polysulphate (19 kg/ha or 17 lbs/acre). 

 

Treatment - blends (w/w)Fertilizer rateNP2O5K2OMgS
kg/ha (lbs/acre) kg/ha (lbs/acre) kg/ha (lbs/acre) kg/ha (lbs/acre) kg/ha (lbs/acre) kg/ha (lbs/acre)
Control (MAP only) 58 (52)6 (5)30 (27)---
SSP158 (141)030 (27)--19 (17)
MAP + Gypsum (S=19)167 (149)6 (5)30 (27)0019 (17)
MAP + Polysulphate (S=19)158 (141)6 (5)30 (27)14 (21)4 (3)19 (17)
MAP + Polysulphate (S=38)258 (230)6 (5)30 (27)28 (25)7 (6)38 (34)
MAP + Polysulphate (S=57)358 (319)6 (5)30 (27)42 (37)11 (10)57 (51)

Results

  • Soybean responded significantly to sulfur application. 
  • There were statistically significant differences between Polysulphate and other sources of sulfur (SSP and gypsum). Additionally, soybean yield responded positively to increasing rates of Polysulphate. 

 

Polysulphate fertilizer increases soybean grain yield.

Polysulphate fertilizer increases soybean grain yield.

 

Different letters above bars indicate significant differences among treatments (p<0.05)

From research funded by the International Potash Institute www.ipipotash.org.

 

Other Interesting Trials

Soybean & Polysulphate
Lucas do Rio Verde, Mato Grosso state, Brazil, 2017
Trail

9.7

Yield Increase
Soybean & Polysulphate
Cruz Alta, Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil, 2019
Trail

3.9

Yield Increase
Polysulphate on Soybean
Itapúa, Paraguay, 2018
Trail

10.8

Yield Increase