Nutrient Use Efficiency in Potato
12.3
Proefcentrum Zwaagdijk, The Netherlands 2015
12.3
Key Conclusions
Coated N treatment (Agromaster) produced 9.8% more potato tubers, an impressive 12.3% more yield per kg applied nutrient when compared to CAN. This equates to a 14% ROI when using Agromaster instead of the control (CAN) treatment.
Objective
Controlled release fertilizers in seed potatoes
Optimum efficiency of mineral fertilizers is essential for a sustainable agricultural production. With the increasing world demand for food and energy, this is set to become an ever increasing priority. There is an absolute requirement to maximize efficiency, using both agronomic and plant breeding approaches.
Nutrient use efficiency may be defined as yield per unit fertilizer input, or in terms of recovery of fertilizer applied.
Nitrogen is the nutrient applied at highest rates in agriculture. According to the FAO database, total nitrogen consumption came up to 99.6 million MT in 2013. Globally, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) for cereal production is estimated at merely 33-40%. The unaccounted 60-67% represents ~$20 billion annual loss of N fertilizer, by soil de-nitrification, volatilization, surface runoff, and leaching (William & Johnson, 1999). These reasons made it the nutrient lost at highest rates in agriculture. The fraction that is lost from the cropping system is the source of much of the environmental pollution associated with fertilization.
Numerous studies demonstrate that Controlled Release Fertilizers (CRF) provide significant reduction in nitrogen losses and considerably increased nutrient use efficiencies, hence increased yields and quality.
Trial Details
Trial station
Proefcentrum Zwaagdijk, The Netherlands
Crop
Potato
Product
Agromaster®
Assessments
Nutrient use efficiency (NUE)
Treatments
This trial evaluated 2 fertilizer treatments. The Control received 127 kg/ha N from CAN fertilizer. The Agromaster treatment received 127 kg/ha N from Agromaster. Both the Control and Agromaster treatments received identical P & K applications.
Treatment | Fertilizer type | N Application |
---|---|---|
Control | CAN 27%N | 127 kg/ha |
Agromaster | Agromaster (Coated N) | 127 kg/ha |
P & K applications were identical for both treatments |
Treatments
This trial evaluated 2 fertilizer treatments. The Control received 127 kg/ha N from CAN fertilizer. The Agromaster treatment received 127 kg/ha N from Agromaster. Both the Control and Agromaster treatments received identical P & K applications.
Treatment | Fertilizer type | N Application |
---|---|---|
Control | CAN 27%N | 127 kg/ha |
Agromaster | Agromaster (Coated N) | 127 kg/ha |
P & K applications were identical for both treatments |
Results
Analysis of the results shows that:
- The coated N (Agromaster) treatment produced 9.8% more potato tubers
- There was a 12.3% increase in yield per applied nutrient with the Agromaster treatment when compared to CAN
- The Agromaster treatment produced a 14% return on investment compared to the CAN treatment
Fertilizer type | N Treatment | Tuber no. | No. of tubers | tuber yield | PFP tuber yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
kg/ha | tuber/ha | tubers/kg N | MT/ha | kg tubers/kg N | |
CAN 27%N | 127 | 461,200 | 3,631.5 | 52.8 | 416 |
Agromaster (coated N) | 127 | 506,500 | 3,988.2 | 59.3 | 467 |
Ratio Agromaster vs CAN | + 9.8% | + 12.3% |