Sports pitch nutrition with Sierrablen Plus

Trial designed to compare longevity of turf response for Sierrablen Plus 19-5-18 compared with 3 competitor products.

UK

Trial Details

Trial station

UK

Product

Sierrablen Plus

Assessments

turf response

Treatments

A randomised and replicated field trial located on a Lolium perenne sward over a professional sand dominated fibresand rootzone.

 

Treatment numberProductAnalysis (NPK)*Application rate (g/m2)Stated longevity
T1Sierrablen Plus Active19-5-18303 M+
T2Competitor 120-5-8303-4 M
T3Competitor 216-0-12303 M
T4Competitor 311-4-22 + Fe303-4 M

 

Turf Colour was measured on a 1-10 scale regularly through the trial up to 90 days.

Turf Quality was measured on a 1-10 scale regularly through the trial up to 90 days.

Treatments

A randomised and replicated field trial located on a Lolium perenne sward over a professional sand dominated fibresand rootzone.

 

Treatment numberProductAnalysis (NPK)*Application rate (g/m2)Stated longevity
T1Sierrablen Plus Active19-5-18303 M+
T2Competitor 120-5-8303-4 M
T3Competitor 216-0-12303 M
T4Competitor 311-4-22 + Fe303-4 M

 

Turf Colour was measured on a 1-10 scale regularly through the trial up to 90 days.

Turf Quality was measured on a 1-10 scale regularly through the trial up to 90 days.

Results

Turf colour remained above 5.0 (acceptable) for 85 days after application.
All other products dropped below a score of 5.0.
Two products did not provide good colour for 60 days (despite having stated longevities of 3M).

 

Chart showing turf colour development

 

Turf quality remained above 5.0 (acceptable) for 85 days after application.
All other products dropped below a score of 5.0.
Two products did not provide good colour for 60 days (despite having stated longevities of 3M).

Chart showing turf quality development

 

 

 

More Interesting Trials

Vitalnova
Lyon Salvagny Golf Club
Sierrablen Plus Pearl technology
NIBIO institute
H2Pro AquaSmart programme
Lancaster University
Trail

30

increased plant biomass